While the general emphasis of literary linguistics called stylistics is on the interpretation of the writer’s style, the study of mind style involves an explication of textual meaning from the reader’s perspective. The former is more writer-based while the later is more reader-biased. Interestingly, the two find their data primarily from the writer’s deft creation of text, narrator and characters. This paper examines mind style in Chimamada Ngozi Adiche’s novel, Purple Hibiscus with particular focus on Kambili, the teenage narrator. Extracts from the novel are analyzed based on linguistic and cognitive analytical parameters of persistent lexical patterns, syntactic structures, and resonating figurative language that carve a peculiar world view which characterizes the text fictional universe. The paper demonstrates that the narrator exhibits unusual mind style which projects a striking contrast of her real self through mutational narration characterized by ellipsis, predilection for syntactical pattern that makes part of her body agent instead of herself, passivisation, first person singular pronoun plus static or still verbs, and peculiar figures of speech. Through these devices, the paper shows that the narrator’s mental state is fraught with fear, muteness, frustration and intimidation in the cognitive plane, thus foregrounding her conceptualization of the suffocating reality of her household. It concludes that analysis of mind style is productive for effective reading of fiction.
Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11 |
Page(s) | 233-238 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Literary Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology, Mind Style, Purple Hibiscus
[1] | Adichie, C. N. (2006). Purple Hibiscus. Lagos: Kachifo Limited. |
[2] | Ali, A. G. (2016). ‘A cognitive Stylistic Study of Poetic Discourse’. ALUSTATH. Vol. 1. Pp. 17-34. |
[3] | Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[4] | Fowler, R. (1996). ‘On Critical Linguistics’. Coulthard G. and Coulthard M. (eds.) Text and Practices: Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 1-14. |
[5] | Fowler, R. (1997). Linguistics and the Novel. London: Arrow Smith. |
[6] | Hough, G. (1969). Style and Stylistics. London. Routledge and Kegan Paul. |
[7] | Leech, G. N and Short, M. H. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. (2nd Ed). London: Pearson Education Limited. |
[8] | Margolin, U. (2003). “Cognitive Science, the Thinking Mind, and Literary Narrative.” Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. David H. (ed.) Stanford, CA.: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Pp. 271-94. |
[9] | Murana, M. O. (2011). An Introduction to Stylistics. Zaria: Nasif Publishers. |
[10] | Palmer, A. (2004). Fictional Minds. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. |
[11] | Pilliere, L. (2013). ‘Mind Style: Deviance from the Norm?’ Etudes de Stylistque anglaise. pp. 67- 80. |
[12] | Semino, E. and Swindlerhurst, K (1996). ‘Metaphor and Mind Style in Ken Kesey’s ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,’StyleVol. 30, No. 1, pp. 146-166. |
[13] | Semino, E. and Culpeper, J. (eds.) (2003). Cognitive Stylistics. Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamin. |
[14] | Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. |
[15] | Traugott, E. C. and Pratt M. L. (1980). Linguistics for Students of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. |
[16] | Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman. |
APA Style
Suleiman, A., Muniru Oladayo, M., Ibrahim, Y. (2023). A Study of Mind Style in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 11(6), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11
ACS Style
Suleiman, A.; Muniru Oladayo, M.; Ibrahim, Y. A Study of Mind Style in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2023, 11(6), 233-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11
AMA Style
Suleiman A, Muniru Oladayo M, Ibrahim Y. A Study of Mind Style in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus. Int J Lit Arts. 2023;11(6):233-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11, author = {Adama Suleiman and Murana Muniru Oladayo and Yusuf Ibrahim}, title = {A Study of Mind Style in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus}, journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts}, volume = {11}, number = {6}, pages = {233-238}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20231106.11}, abstract = {While the general emphasis of literary linguistics called stylistics is on the interpretation of the writer’s style, the study of mind style involves an explication of textual meaning from the reader’s perspective. The former is more writer-based while the later is more reader-biased. Interestingly, the two find their data primarily from the writer’s deft creation of text, narrator and characters. This paper examines mind style in Chimamada Ngozi Adiche’s novel, Purple Hibiscus with particular focus on Kambili, the teenage narrator. Extracts from the novel are analyzed based on linguistic and cognitive analytical parameters of persistent lexical patterns, syntactic structures, and resonating figurative language that carve a peculiar world view which characterizes the text fictional universe. The paper demonstrates that the narrator exhibits unusual mind style which projects a striking contrast of her real self through mutational narration characterized by ellipsis, predilection for syntactical pattern that makes part of her body agent instead of herself, passivisation, first person singular pronoun plus static or still verbs, and peculiar figures of speech. Through these devices, the paper shows that the narrator’s mental state is fraught with fear, muteness, frustration and intimidation in the cognitive plane, thus foregrounding her conceptualization of the suffocating reality of her household. It concludes that analysis of mind style is productive for effective reading of fiction. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Study of Mind Style in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus AU - Adama Suleiman AU - Murana Muniru Oladayo AU - Yusuf Ibrahim Y1 - 2023/11/09 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 233 EP - 238 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231106.11 AB - While the general emphasis of literary linguistics called stylistics is on the interpretation of the writer’s style, the study of mind style involves an explication of textual meaning from the reader’s perspective. The former is more writer-based while the later is more reader-biased. Interestingly, the two find their data primarily from the writer’s deft creation of text, narrator and characters. This paper examines mind style in Chimamada Ngozi Adiche’s novel, Purple Hibiscus with particular focus on Kambili, the teenage narrator. Extracts from the novel are analyzed based on linguistic and cognitive analytical parameters of persistent lexical patterns, syntactic structures, and resonating figurative language that carve a peculiar world view which characterizes the text fictional universe. The paper demonstrates that the narrator exhibits unusual mind style which projects a striking contrast of her real self through mutational narration characterized by ellipsis, predilection for syntactical pattern that makes part of her body agent instead of herself, passivisation, first person singular pronoun plus static or still verbs, and peculiar figures of speech. Through these devices, the paper shows that the narrator’s mental state is fraught with fear, muteness, frustration and intimidation in the cognitive plane, thus foregrounding her conceptualization of the suffocating reality of her household. It concludes that analysis of mind style is productive for effective reading of fiction. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -