Metaphor and metonymy, which are figures of speech as well as means of cognition and ways of thinking, are commonly used in literary works, allowing authors to better express themselves and helping readers appreciate the charm of language. In order to have a better understanding of how they add to the cultural connotations of literary works and expand readers’ cognition, this article selects typical sentences from Chi ZiJian Prose featured by vivid and poetic language and analyzes how metaphor and metonymy, as important rhetorical devices and ways of thinking, act as active roles in adding luster to literary works and helping readers grasp the spirit and emotion of the author and in return, further broaden their perceptions by creating extensive connections. Therefore, readers are supposed to utilize their past cognitive experience and fully exert their imagination to find similarities and build connections, project their knowledge and experience from one domain to the other, understand the hidden meaning and thus the cognitive purposes can be achieved. The analysis of this study also places emphasis on the cultural background and the intentionality of the author because words and sentences can not be isolated from the context or it can be interpreted in many different ways.
Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17 |
Page(s) | 138-146 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Chi Zijian Prose, Metaphor, Metonymy, Cognitive Experience, Conceptual Domain
[1] | Aristotle. Rhetoric and Poetics. New York: The Modern Library, 1954. |
[2] | George Lakoff & Kovecses Zoltan. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 195-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. |
[3] | George Lakoff, Johnson. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. |
[4] | George Lakoff, Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999. |
[5] | George Lakoff & Turner Mark. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. |
[6] | George Lakoff. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987: 68-76. |
[7] | Langacker Ronald W. “Syntactic Reanalysis”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 1977 (57): 139. |
[8] | Johnson. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. The University of Chicago Press, 1987. |
[9] | Taylor, Robinson and Ellis (Ed.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 2008: 50. |
[10] | Chen Jiaxu. A Contrastive Study of HAPPINESS Emotion Metaphors Between English and Chinese. Foreign Languages And Their Teaching, 2007 (7): 36-37. |
[11] | Chi Zijian. Chi Zijian Prose. Zhejiang: Zhejiang Literature and Art Publishing House, 2015. |
[12] | Dong Chengru. A Cognitive Account of Metonymy. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2004, (02): 6-9. |
[13] | Guo Zhenwei. On the Subjectivity of Metaphor of Fortress Besieged. Qilu Journal, 2014, (01): 151-154. |
[14] | Hu Xiaorong. Cognitive Perspectives on Emotional Metaphors in Fortress Besieged. The Youth Writers, 2016 (2): 130-131. |
[15] | Huang Bilian & Yu Rui. On the Metonymical Properties of Acceptation of Body Terms. Foreign Language Research, 2011 (4): 19-23. |
[16] | Liu Bin & He Qingqing. A Visualized Analysis on the Cognitive Studies of Metonymy in China. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 2020, 34 (01): 89-96. |
[17] | Qiu Yanfang & Ma Yunfei. The Interpretation of Body-emotion Metonymy and Metaphor in Fortress Besieged. Journal of Longyan University, 2018, 36 (03): 114-119. |
[18] | Shu Dingfang. Studies in Metaphor. Shang Hai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2000: 3, 11. |
[19] | Tang Jiali. An Analysis of the English Translation of Metaphors in Zhuangzi from the Perspective of Ontological Metaphor Theory. Art and Literature for the Masses, 2020, (17): 133-134. |
[20] | Wan Jinhong. Language and Body. Foreign Language Research, 2009 (6): 9-11. |
[21] | Wu Feifei. A Brief Comment on Common Metaphors in A Dream of the Red Mansions. Education Teaching Forum, 2012 (41). |
[22] | Wu Shuqiong. The Comparative Study of the Polysemous Networks of English Word"face"and Chinese "Lian" and“Mian" and Their Cognitve Motivation. Journal of China West Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2009, 161 (3): 88-95. |
[23] | Zhu Chengqi & Su Jianrong. Memetic Analysis of Metaphorical Transmission Mechanism. Journal of Anhui University of Technology (Natural Science), 2010 (2): 92-94. |
APA Style
Lu Siyi, Ma Yueling. (2023). Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Prose. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 11(3), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17
ACS Style
Lu Siyi; Ma Yueling. Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Prose. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2023, 11(3), 138-146. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17
AMA Style
Lu Siyi, Ma Yueling. Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Prose. Int J Lit Arts. 2023;11(3):138-146. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17, author = {Lu Siyi and Ma Yueling}, title = {Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Prose}, journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts}, volume = {11}, number = {3}, pages = {138-146}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20231103.17}, abstract = {Metaphor and metonymy, which are figures of speech as well as means of cognition and ways of thinking, are commonly used in literary works, allowing authors to better express themselves and helping readers appreciate the charm of language. In order to have a better understanding of how they add to the cultural connotations of literary works and expand readers’ cognition, this article selects typical sentences from Chi ZiJian Prose featured by vivid and poetic language and analyzes how metaphor and metonymy, as important rhetorical devices and ways of thinking, act as active roles in adding luster to literary works and helping readers grasp the spirit and emotion of the author and in return, further broaden their perceptions by creating extensive connections. Therefore, readers are supposed to utilize their past cognitive experience and fully exert their imagination to find similarities and build connections, project their knowledge and experience from one domain to the other, understand the hidden meaning and thus the cognitive purposes can be achieved. The analysis of this study also places emphasis on the cultural background and the intentionality of the author because words and sentences can not be isolated from the context or it can be interpreted in many different ways.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Metonymy in Prose AU - Lu Siyi AU - Ma Yueling Y1 - 2023/06/21 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 138 EP - 146 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.17 AB - Metaphor and metonymy, which are figures of speech as well as means of cognition and ways of thinking, are commonly used in literary works, allowing authors to better express themselves and helping readers appreciate the charm of language. In order to have a better understanding of how they add to the cultural connotations of literary works and expand readers’ cognition, this article selects typical sentences from Chi ZiJian Prose featured by vivid and poetic language and analyzes how metaphor and metonymy, as important rhetorical devices and ways of thinking, act as active roles in adding luster to literary works and helping readers grasp the spirit and emotion of the author and in return, further broaden their perceptions by creating extensive connections. Therefore, readers are supposed to utilize their past cognitive experience and fully exert their imagination to find similarities and build connections, project their knowledge and experience from one domain to the other, understand the hidden meaning and thus the cognitive purposes can be achieved. The analysis of this study also places emphasis on the cultural background and the intentionality of the author because words and sentences can not be isolated from the context or it can be interpreted in many different ways. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -